First of all let me explain to you what is my definition of artistic and what of a postcard. A postcard is a very target specific photograph with sole purpose to advertise the merits of a specific place. Its merits are usually a good composition and technical excellence without though any distinct characteristics of the person who took this picture or lacking the ability to create any sort of sentiments to the viewer. Artistic on the other hand is a landscape photograph that even though it isn't technically excellent all the time, has the ability to convey some of the feelings that the photographer was experiencing while we was taking the picture. Don't get me wrong I don't condemn the whole postcard type of photographs. One might say that I too take more postcard kind of picture instead of artistic.
What triggered this whole debate in me was a comment I read on a forum concerning Yann Arthus Bertrand's Home project. And I quote "Even though Yann Arthur-Bertrand for many friends of photography doesn't meet up with the artistic definition of photography the film Home is well worth watching".
So I wonder why for some people excellent work like that is not considered to be artistic? It meets all my criteria about being artistic, are my criteria that wrong? For those of you who are not familiar with Yann Arthus Bertrand's work here is a closer to home example since if you watch me I believe you are more familiar with my work. The road to Rivendell when posted to a forum dedicated to critique was greeted with mixed emotions. Some said it was great some though said that even though it was technically excellent and looks great as postcard i failed to take advantage of the situation and create an artistic photograph. I don't mind people saying that and I am not looking for praise, it is just that it came as a shock to me cause even though I do consider some of my photographs to be postcard like this isn't one of them. On the contrary when I developed it i had this feeling that yes it is a landmark well photographed in Greece and everybody stops to take a picture of this bridge when the pass by it, but my view taking advantage of the situation is unique. Being insecure as I am I take it that everybody else is right except me and I am in the process of re-evaluating my beliefs about artistic or not. So what do you think? What should a landscape photograph have in order to be considered artistic and if you can show me what you consider artistic and what not. You can vote at the Poll but I'd rather have your answer here since there are no restricting options.
Summer is officially here today as it is the Summer Solstice. Happy summer ![]()
new features all around! Go and check them out ![]()

























Devious Comments
10 προς 1 πως ήταν σε ελληνικό!
--
Si nun ce stess'o mare e tu
Nun ce stesse manch'io
και ναι ήταν Ελληνικό
--
I want to have text with you
Θέλω να ελπίζω πως δε θα δώσεις βάση και θα συνεχίσεις να παράγεις τις εικόνες σου.
ΥΓ : άλλη φορά φέρνε την ομίχλη πιο κοντά.. βάλε κάποιον να φυσάει απ την άλλη ή κάτι τέτοιο
--
Si nun ce stess'o mare e tu
Nun ce stesse manch'io
--
I want to have text with you
Dunno if I answered your question. But well, I agree with your concept of postcard and artistic
--
Sleepwalker seducing me
I dare to enter your ecstasy
Lay yourself now down to sleep
In my dreams you're mine to keep
--
“Like rain on a cold window, these thoughts pattered against the hard surface of the incontrovertible truth.” - J.K. Rowling
"It is easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them." - Alfred Adler
I'm not an expert, I can't offer deeper insight...
--
Proud citizen of Warsaw [link]
Proud bassist [link]
Art still is a vast domain, most people like to see it their own way, so they start putting limits to it, i think that we-ll never find a good definition for art, since its based on feelings, and these things you cant monitor in the "right" way since they are subjective, and each person does experience them in a different way..
I was just reading a book about photography, and it starts by comparing the early photographers in the 18th century with painters at that time, and how slowly photography did replace paintings, anyway, a lot of people who were not considered artists, who were just "journalists" at that time, have created great images, and after their death, they were praised, and created a style that now its well known
Nah, i know what i wrote its pretty confusing lol, its a bit late for me now, and im a bit tired, but i want you to know, that we all experience doubt, especially those of us who want to get better, and each bad review, makes us put a lot questions, anyway its always easier to look at another person, to judge, so trust me, your photos surely are not postcards, they surely have a personal approach, and i find them really interesting
--
"art is a selfish thing, all art has to be for the person who is doing it, it has to be something they are driven to do, and the fact that other people like it, it's a bonus" David Gilmour
bogdanciocsan.com
If this is a technical debate then I am wrong in even replying to your journal as I am dumb as a sack of hammers where the technical aspects of photography are concerned.
--
--
Boycott shampoo! Demand the REAL poo!
Steven Wright
Previous Page1234Next Page